Update on Strategy 1:
High-impact Strategy: |
Strategy 1: Transform Advising |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Related Goal |
Goal 2: Increase the number of degrees that are earned “on time” (associate degrees in 2 years, bachelor’s degrees in 4 years) also contributes to Goals 1 & 6. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of Activities |
Strategy 1: The previous CCG report detailed the specific strategies of focus related to advising and faculty perception is now positive that the changes have been implemented. With this process in place, students begin classes on time and have quality advising that is much different from the last minute advising experienced during late registration. Changes to advising that were highlighted in the last CCG report are listed below:
While the changes above are still being refined, the primary focus of advising changes during the 2014-2015 academic year was on the New Student Orientation Program, which allowed students to be advised and registered for classes on an earlier timeframe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline Status |
Student GPA based on advising and registration timeframe Fall 2013
Results of Independent Samples t-tests and Descriptive Statistics for GPA During the Fall 2014 Semester by Timeframe Registered for Classes. Student GPA based on advising and registration timeframe Fall 2014
N = Number of student |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical Analysis of Baseline Status |
There are statistically significant differences, at the .001 level of significance, between college students who are advised and register early compared with those who register late with their semester grade point averages (GPAs). Statistically, there is little chance that the higher GPAs achieved by those who were advised and registered early were due to chance. Results show that students who are advised and register early, earn a significantly higher GPA than those who are advised and registered later. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measures of Success |
The percentage of DSC students who are being advised and registering early has increased by nearly 15% since 2012 The mean GPA of those students and the positive difference from those who were advised and registered later has remained consistent. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lessons Learned |
With an obvious GPA advantage to those students who are advised and register early we will continue to push our students to take advantage of this option. With the ability to identify and target a population of our students, those who register later, who are underperforming compared to their counterparts, we can look for other reasons that might be impacting this group of students and work to build services to assist them outside of early advising and registration. |